Text-to-SQL Systems: Tutorial & Best Practices

Text-to-SQL (sometimes abbreviated T2SQL) systems are revolutionizing user interaction with databases by enabling inquiries in natural language to yield structured query responses. This transition promises to reduce the need for SQL expertise, making data more accessible across organizations. Instead of manually crafting complex SQL queries, users can simply make requests in natural language. Subsequently, the system constructs the appropriate SQL query, retrieves the data, and displays the results.

Fully autonomous solutions automate two main steps:

• Query Generation: Creates the SQL statement based on what the user inquires. Stand-alone, this step can act as a "SQL copilot" for data engineers.
• Execution of Queries: The autonomous system executes the generated queries to get the desired data and sends them back directly to the inquirer.

In some systems, only the first step is automatic; a person does the last query check before it is run. When both steps are automated, however, the system works more like an autonomous agent, writing and running the query without any help from a person.

Text-to-SQL technology has experienced notable advancements, especially with the emergence of large language models (LLMs), which have markedly enhanced the precision and adaptability of SQL query generation from natural language inputs. This article thoroughly explores some of the most important concepts related to this technology, including illustrative examples.

‍Summary of core text-to-SQL concepts 

Text-to-SQL system architectures

Text-to-SQL system architectures have evolved from rule-based systems to sophisticated neural methodologies. These architectures aim to transform natural language queries into SQL commands, enabling the extraction of pertinent information from databases. 

Rule-based architectures

The earlier NLP-based text-to-SQL systems depended significantly on established rules that converted particular phrases or sentence structures into SQL queries. The architectures were straightforward and understandable, yet they offered limited flexibility. Their setup was labor-intensive, and they faced challenges extending their capabilities beyond fixed queries or managing intricate database architectures.

• Benefits: Straightforwardness, quicker performance for set queries, and convenience of implementation for smaller applications
• Limitations: Rigidity, lack of adaptability to novel inquiries, and inadequate scalability for intricate, practical scenarios

LLM-based architectures

Modern text-to-SQL systems leverage deep learning models, especially large language models (LLMs) such as GPT-4, to derive SQL queries from natural language input. On the other hand, models can be fine-tuned to perform better in the Text-to-SQL operation or even customized to fit a specific business scenario. These systems can manage a variety of inputs and adapt to numerous query types without requiring extensive manual setup.

• Benefits: Greater flexibility, ability to generalize to a wider variety of inputs, and scalability for complicated queries across multiple tables‍
• Limitations: High computational cost and vulnerability to errors in vague or unclear queries

Challenges of building text-to-SQL systems

Developing production-ready text for SQL systems requires tackling numerous problems. Real-world databases typically have multiple tables with sophisticated relationships. It takes data analysts time to understand the available data and relationships, and writing SQL queries is often an iterative process. Analysts execute trial SQL queries to understand the data model, discover example data, and then refine these queries to answer the original questions about the data. It is difficult to generate accurate SQL queries, especially the first time you encounter a new data warehouse.

‍

‍

Let’s address some of the challenges in building text-to-SQL systems.

Schema selection and prompt efficiency

Early LLM-based systems provided the table schema in the prompt. One of the main issues with this approach is selecting the correct table schemas to include in the prompt, which requires knowledge from the analyst. Even with longer LLM context windows, including the complete database schema with every prompt becomes inefficient and introduces further challenges. This approach relies on the LLM fully understanding the database schema of the user's natural language query. The LLM would need to disambiguate the meaning of terms used within your organization to select the correct tables/columns and deduplicate where multiple tables/columns exist. Typically, these descriptions are intended to provide a brief overview of the contents of tables and columns. However, they do not offer the LLM any actionable instructions regarding the appropriate use of specific tables to generate precise SQL. To make the prompt more practical, structured guidelines that guide the decision-making process for the LLM need to be added. Also, this approach does not consider the relevance or sensitivity of the underlying data to the user.

{{banner-large-1="/banners"}}

Accuracy of LLMs despite perfect semantics

There are still problems with accuracy even after giving the system the cleanest semantics and ensuring it fully knows the context. It's still possible for LLMs to make mistakes when writing the right SQL query because normal language is often complicated, and ambiguity is still a problem. If the model doesn't know the difference between "revenue" from different sources (like gross revenue vs. net revenue), a question like "Give me the revenue for last month" might still give you mixed results. Also, the system might have trouble with semantic variations, which happen when different areas use words that mean the same thing.

Determinism of responses for repeat queries

Another big challenge in building strong text-to-SQL systems is ensuring that responses are deterministic. People expect to get the same answer every time they ask the same question, especially when it's important for business. However, LLMs are not deterministic by nature. This means the same query asked by different users may produce slightly different SQL outputs.

Determinism is very important in business settings where keeping facts consistent is very important. To maintain trust in the system, an expert who asks, "What are the total sales for the last quarter?" must use the same SQL code every time. Text-to-SQL systems need methods like reinforcement learning and feedback loops to make sure that the model's responses stay the same over time to be deterministic.

‍Encoding of business semantics beyond language context

Adding business meanings beyond simple language-based context is one of the more difficult parts of Text-to-SQL agents. For many business questions, it's not enough for the system to understand natural language; the model also needs to know the business logic and formulas beneath the words.

For instance, to find a business measure like ARR (Annual Recurring Revenue), you don't just use a SQL query. Instead, you use a formula that combines different database fields, often incorporating more complex logic. This is one way to figure out ARR:

SELECT SUM(contract_value) AS ARR 
FROM contracts 
WHERE contract_type = 'recurring' AND start_date >= '2023-01-01';

‍

However, even this is a simple yet business-context-sensitive formula. More realistic formulas can be much more complex, such as:

SUM(contract_value) for recurring contracts + SUM(contract_value)/3 for perpetual contracts - SUM(contract_value) for churn

‍

Due to this, the LLM needs to know that ARR is a business figure and not just a sum of numbers. To add these business semantics to the Text-to-SQL system, you need to make rules and semantic layers that can understand complicated business formulas and instantly figure out things like ARR, CLV, or gross margin.

Data security, privacy, and governance

Data security, privacy, and governance preservation become increasingly important as text-to-SQL systems are integrated into enterprise environments. These systems must be designed to prevent unauthorized access, data leakage, and breaches as they interact with sensitive data. Role-based access controls (RBAC) ensure that users can only access data they are permitted to view, while query validation mechanisms sanitize inputs to prevent attacks such as SQL injection. Furthermore, encryption and data obfuscation safeguard proprietary data and personally identifiable information (PII). From a governance perspective, audit logs monitor user queries and data access, thereby guaranteeing adherence to data regulations. By incorporating these features into the Semantic and Context layers, this layered approach guarantees that security and privacy are ingrained throughout the data pipeline.

Scalability and adaptability

A major obstacle to achieving scalability and adaptability in practical situations while tackling these challenges remains. Systems need to be able to handle massive databases and change with user demands. The ability of the system to adapt dynamically is crucial as business logic evolves and datasets expand.

Leveraging LLMs for Advanced Text-to-SQL

Using large language models such as GPT-4 and Gemini in text-to-SQL systems has revolutionized the conversion of natural language into SQL queries. LLMs excel at comprehending and producing human-like text, allowing them to manage progressively more intricate SQL queries derived from natural language inputs. They surpass conventional techniques by employing sophisticated neural network architectures that learn from extensive datasets, enhancing precision and adaptability in creating SQL queries. This leads to text-to-SQL systems capable of managing ambiguous queries, discerning user intent, and adapting their responses using prompt chaining. Nevertheless, LLMs' accuracy in producing SQL from text isn't 100% yet. To make the system productive and enterprise-ready, additional techniques are needed. Even if LLMs offer greater language interpretation and code generation capabilities. Because of this versatility, organizations can select the strategy that best suits their requirements, be it more accurate, domain-specific SQL creation, or flexibility over a wide variety of queries. possibly not as skilfully.

Ambiguity resolution

LLMs can scrutinize extensive datasets of natural language inquiries alongside their associated SQL queries to discern trends, resulting in enhanced management of diverse query types. By comprehending syntax, context, and semantics, LLMs facilitate more efficient translation from natural language to SQL. 

In the text-to-SQL task, ambiguity means that one user query could have multiple semantic meanings based on one table. Given the inherent ambiguity of natural language, resolving ambiguity is one of the most formidable challenges in text-to-SQL systems. A question such as “Show me the top-rated movie” could be related to various columns inside the database, requiring that models detect and resolve these ambiguities to prevent erroneous queries. 

Ambiguities are generally categorized into two types: column ambiguity and value ambiguity.

Column ambiguity occurs when a token in the query can be associated with multiple columns. The term “rating” may refer to “IMDB Rating,” “Rotten Tomatoes Rating,” or “Content Rating” in this example. For instance, based on the table below, a possible query is:

SELECT [Movie] ORDER BY [IMDB Rating] DESC LIMIT 1

‍

The LLM could resolve ambiguities in the phrase by checking if the user is referring to an IMDB rating, Rotten Tomatoes score, or content rating based on the context provided by the database (see figure below).

Value ambiguity means a token may correspond to multiple values within a table. A query such as “Show me the data for Jack” could lead to ambiguity if “Jack” is present as both a name in one column and as a product code in another.

A practical solution is achieved by incorporating ambiguity resolution mechanisms, such as sequence labeling or using models like Detecting-Then-Explaining (DTE), as discussed in this paper. These techniques enable text-to-SQL systems to identify and classify ambiguous elements in the user's query, request clarification, or offer potential explanations for the ambiguity. This system is able to more effectively manage and resolve ambiguous spans of text by designating them.

Prompt chaining

LLMs facilitate prompt chaining, a method wherein the model deconstructs intricate requests into a sequence of simpler consecutive prompts. This systematic method clarifies ambiguous queries and enhances the level of accuracy of the generated SQL queries. When a user poses an unclear query, the LLM may require more explanation or context to ensure the accurate execution of the query.

Consider a user who inquires about "Show me the revenue from last month and explain the trends." This request has two components: retrieving data and providing an analysis. The LLM determines the primary request and generates a prompt: "Retrieve the revenue for last month."

SELECT SUM(revenue) AS last_month_revenue 

FROM sales 

WHERE sale_date >= DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE) - INTERVAL '1 month' 

AND sale_date < DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE);

‍

Upon receiving the revenue data, the LLM acknowledges the necessity of addressing the second component of the user's inquiry, which pertains to trends. It may enquire, "What specific trends are you interested in?" For instance, are you seeking comparisons with previous months, growth percentages, or customer segments?

When the user provides more information, such as "I want to compare it to last quarter's revenue," the LLM creates a more complicated SQL query for that analysis.

SELECT  
    SUM(CASE WHEN sale_date >= DATE_TRUNC('quarter', CURRENT_DATE) - INTERVAL '1 quarter' THEN revenue END) AS last_quarter_revenue,
    SUM(CASE WHEN sale_date >= DATE_TRUNC('month', CURRENT_DATE) - INTERVAL '1 month' THEN revenue END) AS last_month_revenue
FROM sales;

‍

The LLM improves the accuracy and relevance of the query by using prompt chaining, which leads to a more meaningful exchange. This way not only helps unambiguously define what the user wants, but it also improves the flow of information so that the user gets all the information they need.

Dynamic query breakdown and contextualization

Models frequently dynamically deconstruct queries into related contexts to address ambiguity. For example, the system can identify the entities involved in a query, such as “people” and “locations,” and then generate a query based on the recognized context. This dynamic decomposition ensures that the appropriate SQL query is generated and prevents confusion between similar entities.

Evolving capabilities and consistency challenges

Though LLMs' capabilities constantly evolve, it's essential to know that the generated SQL for a given prompt may vary with each model iteration. This could cause challenges when implementing text-to-SQL systems across several versions of LLMs, as previously functional queries could show unexpected behavior. A continuous assessment mechanism is essential for the whole system and individual queries. This framework will monitor the model's performance, maintain consistency between versions, and identify any differences that occur during system updates.

Another critical component is that LLMs are engineered to respond to every inquiry, yet not all inquiries can be addressed with SQL. SQL has inherent restrictions, including managing recursive queries, intricate multi-table joins, and hierarchical data structures. Moreover, LLMs are predominantly trained on publicly accessible SQL datasets, frequently consisting of less complex queries. Complex SQL concepts, including fan-trap and chasm-trap scenarios, continue challenging even the most advanced LLMs in generating accurate SQL queries. These pitfalls arise in database schema design and query formulation, resulting in erroneous outcomes when many join or object relationships are misconstrued.

Role of the semantic layer in text to SQL

The semantic layer is very important for making it easier to query large databases because it takes away the complexity of basic data and turns it into business terms that provide context. This layer acts as a structured link between the user's natural language queries and the data structures below.

One of a semantic layer's primary advantages is its capacity to organize data into business definitions. The semantic layer translates business-friendly definitions into queries the database can understand rather than requiring users to know the exact database schema or technical terminology. 

For instance, a business user could query, “What are the sales in North America for Q2?” The semantic layer automatically maps the natural language query elements “sales,” “North America,” and “Q2” to the corresponding columns and tables in the database, thereby transforming the query into a precise SQL query. 

Here are some demo tables showing how a semantic layer would translate a business query into an SQL query.

Business query: “What are the sales in North America for Q2?”

Semantic layer mapping:

• “Sales” → SUM(sale_amount) from the Sales table
• “North America” → region_id corresponding to North America in the Region table
• “Q2” → sale_date from the Sales table, cross-referenced with Q2 in the Time table

‍

‍

‍SQL query generated by semantic layer:

SELECT SUM(s.sale_amount) AS total_sales
FROM Sales s
JOIN Region r ON s.region_id = r.region_id
JOIN Time t ON QUARTER(s.sale_date) = t.quarter AND YEAR(s.sale_date) = t.year
WHERE r.region_name = 'North America'
  AND t.quarter = 'Q2'
  AND t.year = 2023;

‍

The semantic layer's ability to organize raw data into intuitive, business-friendly definitions is demonstrated in this example, enabling users to extract valuable insights without needing technical SQL expertise.

The semantic layer plays a critical role in this scenario by converting business terms such as “North America” and “Q2” into their respective time-based filters and IDs.

These terms are automatically mapped to the appropriate database columns, producing a precise and optimized SQL query without needing the user to comprehend the underlying schema.

Optimizing join relationships

Join links are also optimized by dynamic semantic layers, which figure out the best order in which to run them. When you query across multiple tables with complex links, the system looks at the query to figure out which tables should be joined first. This saves time and keeps you from having to scan tables that aren't needed. This optimization makes queries run faster, especially on big datasets where joins that don't work well can slow down response times.

Let’s examine an example of how a dynamic semantic layer can optimize the join operations for a query. This requires the system to efficiently retrieve information by joining tables containing sales data, product information, and geographic regions.

User Query: “What are the total sales of electronic products in the last quarter across North America?”

Step 1: Identify key tables

• Sales table (for sales data and dates)
• Product table (to filter for electronic products)
• Region table (to identify North America)

Step 2: Prioritize the joins based on existing relationships

1. First, join the Sales and Product table on product_id to narrow the results to electronic products.
2. Next, join the Sales table and Region table on region_id to filter for sales in North America.

Step 3: Apply Necessary Filters

Once the relationships are established, the system applies two filters:

1. region_name = North America
2. The sale_date falls within the last quarter of the year (Q4).

SELECT SUM(s.sale_amount) AS total_sales
FROM Sales s
JOIN Product p ON s.product_id = p.product_id
JOIN Region r ON s.region_id = r.region_id
WHERE p.category = 'Electronics'
  AND r.region_name = 'North America'
  AND QUARTER(s.sale_date) = 4
  AND YEAR(s.sale_date) = 2023;

‍

In this case, the dynamic semantic layer not only makes the process easier but also accurate and deterministic, allowing complicated queries with many relationships and filters to be run quickly and correctly.

Context Layer (by WisdomAI)

The Context Layer is a new idea that goes beyond the semantic layer that is introduced by WisdomAI. This layer encapsulates the advantages of the semantic layer and also includes the business context by describing tables, columns, or business measures and setting rules for when and how to use them. The semantic layer stores business-level definitions, and the context layer tells you how to use them based on certain circumstances. This is especially important when dealing with unclear questions or situations where more than one business term (like ARR, Revenue, or Churn) could be useful at different times.

The Context Layer outlines the appropriate scenarios for utilizing ARR versus Revenue, considering factors such as query intent, time frames, or user access privileges. It might outline guidelines such as “Utilize ARR for SaaS products” or “When preparing quarterly reports, focus on Revenue.” With contextual adaptability, WisdomAI ensures that users receive more pertinent results and that the system reacts more intelligently to intricate queries. This layered approach allows WisdomAI to provide a more robust, scalable, and adaptive solution for businesses, filling in the gaps left by traditional semantic models. 

Text-to-SQL system security

Text-to-SQL systems face a critical challenge in ensuring the security of their underlying data sources, especially when they are used to manage sensitive data and complex databases. If not configured with the appropriate security measures, text-to-SQL systems may be vulnerable to SQL injection attacks, data leakage, or unauthorized access to confidential information. 

This section delves into fundamental security measures, including the function of semantic layers in preserving data security, query disinfection, and validation methods.

Query disinfection and validation methods

SQL injection, which involves the introduction of malevolent code into queries, is a significant risk in any system that converts natural language into SQL queries. Query disinfection techniques must be implemented to alleviate this issue. These techniques involve analyzing and sanitizing user input before its conversion into SQL queries. This guarantees that any potentially harmful inputs are neutralized, preventing assailants from executing unintended commands.

Standard methods for query disinfection include the following:

• Parameterized queries: User inputs are regarded as parameters rather than executable code through parameterized queries. This serves to prevent the execution of malicious code.
• Input escape: Special characters in the user input that could be interpreted as SQL commands are either escaped or stripped out.
• Query structure validation: After a query has been generated, it can be compared to predetermined rules to guarantee that it is consistent with anticipated structures. For instance, the system can verify that only SELECT queries are executed in read-only environments, preventing any attempts to insert, alter, or delete data. some text
  • Query structure validation checks that written SQL queries match a set of rules before they are run. This makes sure that queries are consistent and safe. The following query cannot be executed in a read-only environment:

DELETE FROM orders WHERE order_id = 123;

‍

Dealing with sensitive data in text-to-SQL systems

Text-to-SQL systems frequently handle sensitive data, including personally identifiable information (PII) and proprietary business data. Consequently, security considerations extend beyond the mere validation of queries. Implementing data masking and access control mechanisms is imperative to prevent the unintentional disclosure of sensitive data.

The following are the primary methods for managing sensitive data:

• Data masking is the process of obscuring or masking sensitive data (e.g., credit card numbers or social security numbers) prior to its presentation to users. This enables users to query the data while guaranteeing that sensitive information is concealed.
• Role-based access control (RBAC) is essential in enterprise systems to guarantee that only authorized users can access specific data fields or tables. RBAC can enforce strict data access rules based on user roles, ensuring that sensitive data is only accessible to those with the appropriate clearance.

‍

SELECT SUM(sale_amount) AS total_sales 
FROM sales 
WHERE region = 'East' AND quarter = 'Q4';

‍

‍

SELECT SUM(sale_amount) AS total_sales 
FROM sales 
WHERE region = ‘West’ AND quarter = 'Q4';

‍

• Administrators should implement comprehensive audit logs to monitor who accessed which data and when. This can assist in detecting suspicious activity, unauthorized access, or unexpected queries.

WisdomAI data security & audit

Technologies like WisdomAI provide security safeguards that protect sensitive data while facilitating uninterrupted query execution. WisdomAI employs end-to-end encryption, role-based access control, and query validation methods to protect data in corporate settings.

In WisdomAI's approach, queries are sanitized before execution, and role-based access controls guarantee that users can only access data they are permitted to view. WisdomAI's security framework facilitates ongoing monitoring and audit recording, enabling administrators to oversee data access and maintain adherence to security protocols.

By including security measures like query validation, data masking, and role-based access control, text-to-SQL systems can protect sensitive data. At the same time, ensuring users have unobstructed access to necessary information. WisdomAI and analogous technologies, in conjunction with semantic layers, guarantee that security is integrated into all facets of data querying and retrieval, preserving efficiency and robust protection.

In addition to its robust security features, WisdomAI involves auditing capabilities that allow administrators to verify that security controls are being adequately enforced. Monitoring the data obtained during each encounter and recording user instructions are essential to this feature. Administrators are able to verify that users have only viewed the material they are permitted to view. This audit trail is crucial for ensuring compliance with data governance regulations. It guarantees that security specifications are fulfilled, providing users with the assurance that private data is safeguarded even while they interact with the system in real time.

{{banner-small-1="/banners"}}

Continuous improvement through feedback workflows

To accommodate increasingly intricate queries and user requirements, text-to-SQL systems must undergo continuous development. A one-time trained system requires a predetermined set of individuals, such as a development team, to initially populate the semantic layer with rules and definitions. While this may establish a solid foundation, it is not adaptable since it cannot account for every possible case or future user requirement. In contrast, a continuous learning system retains all users' insights and behaviors throughout time, allowing it to adjust dynamically to new requests and needs. Incorporating user feedback into the system's functionality is one of the most effective methods of guaranteeing continuous improvement. Feedback offers vital insights into the system's performance, identifying areas where the text-to-SQL model can be improved, thereby enhancing user satisfaction and accuracy over time.

User feedback to refine text-to-SQL systems

In a dynamic data environment, user queries and database structures undergo frequent modifications. User feedback is essential for maintaining the accuracy and efficacy of text-to-SQL systems. 

Feedback is essential for the system to improve the accuracy of results and the generation of queries by allowing it to learn from errors or misunderstandings in query interpretation. For instance, users' feedback can be utilized to modify the system's response mechanisms, thereby enhancing future interactions if they receive inaccurate results due to ambiguous phrasing or schema complexity.

A system such as WisdomAI can continuously learn from user interactions by implementing feedback loops. The system can update its Context Layer whenever a user provides feedback on the accuracy or relevance of a result. If multiple users rectify queries that misinterpret a column label, e.g., “cost” versus “price,” the system can update its internal mappings to recognize user intent more accurately.

Feedback loops provide several advantages:

• The consistent integration of user feedback enhances the system's ability to interpret ambiguous or imprecise queries, improving its accuracy.
• Feedback loops enable the system to rectify recurring errors or misinterpretations. As it learns from its errors over time, the system will require less manual intervention.
• Each feedback cycle improves the system's comprehension of user preferences, language nuances, and database structure, which is essential for adapting to an organization's changing requirements.

Accuracy testing for performance optimization

A strong evaluation framework is needed in text-to-SQL systems to ensure that the SQL queries they create are correct. This framework constantly checks that SQL queries are right in several situations, such as:

• When changes or new training data are added, the framework checks to see if the model can write correct SQL queries based on its better understanding.
• Using an evaluation framework ensures the model can change how it generates queries to work with new database schemas without losing accuracy.
• If changes are made to the semantic layer, the framework checks how they affect the resulting SQL queries to ensure they are still relevant to the situation.
• When the LLM is updated, the framework is very important to ensure that any changes to the model's structure or training don't make SQL output less accurate.

In this way of thinking, LLMs can be used to judge each other's work. For example, one LLM can look over the SQL that was made by another model and see if it matches the expected results or the standards that have already been set. On the other hand, two models can run at the same time, each producing a SQL query for the same input. This lets the results be compared without the need for human proof.

Last thoughts on text-to-SQL

This article covered the essential elements that facilitate the success of a resilient and scalable text-to-SQL system. We analyzed the transition from rule-based systems to contemporary neural approaches, emphasizing the significant enhancement in systems' capacity to comprehend and generate SQL queries from natural language inputs facilitated by large language models (LLMs). 

We highlighted the significance of semantic layers in streamlining business inquiries through the abstraction of technical intricacies, along with the constraints of conventional semantic models in managing extensive table collections or intricate relationships. We presented the notion of dynamic semantic layers, which are more adept at adjusting to real-time situations and enhancing query efficiency.

Security is essential to any text-to-SQL system, particularly when handling sensitive information. We examined how query disinfection, data masking, and role-based access restrictions safeguard data and inhibit unauthorized access. Finally, we emphasized the significance of feedback loops and testing in enhancing these systems, guaranteeing ongoing progress informed by user interactions.

WisdomAI represents a simplified method for generating insightful analysis from data. Like conversational AI programs like ChatGPT, you can just enter a query to instantly get pertinent knowledge, enabling effective, data-driven decision-making. WisdomAI dynamically optimizes queries based on context and user intent by building a dynamic semantic layer. This flexibility enables effectively managing big table collections and intricate join relationships, enhancing queries' accuracy and speed. Furthermore, WisdomAI offers a strong foundation for safely managing sensitive data and an underlying AI knowledge graph that learns more with more data and users.